And this, in turn, can affect the amount of revenue you bring in.Ībout 60% of patients in the United States check the health provider’s ratings and reviews before making a choice. Remember, there’s a lot more to healthcare productivity than “hard” metrics like time taken and cost per patient.įocusing on other aspects, like satisfaction and service quality, can give you a lot more information about the effectiveness of your healthcare organization as a whole. However, if that comes at the cost of decreased patient satisfaction, then the metric isn’t useful.

Providing patients with quicker service can sometimes be a good performance measurement. Why is the Traditional Method Ineffective? Sure, serving patients quicker and optimizing your hospital expenses can positively affect workforce productivity in the health system.īut this isn’t the best way to track productivity. That’s why, according to traditional productivity monitoring, having lower costs and faster hospital services indicates higher labor productivity. Health care costs related to hospital equipment, drugs, utilities, and other expenses.The financial productivity measurement includes things like: The total time a health care employee spends with each patient.The number of patients a care provider sees over a given period.The time needed to take care of a patient.When it comes to the time productivity metric, people consider: Here, the two key metrics are time and financials, which directly focus on the bottom line of your operations, rather than the quality of services you provide. In the healthcare sector, the traditional measures of productivity are the labor output per health worker and the cost of the goods/services. What are the Key Metrics of the Traditional Productivity Approach?

Labor standard calculator